Sunbeam Alpine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2024 4:00 pm
You clearly don't understand.
Nor do you address the point that his behaviour elsewhere was possibly worse but you make no comment there.
See post above
Re: Savile/Yewtree/Others (Part 2)
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 4:19 pm
by Holden Mcgroyne
Sunbeam Alpine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 18, 2024 5:29 pm
Waste of time talking to you.
Sunbeam Alpine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2024 4:00 pm
You clearly don't understand.
Nor do you address the point that his behaviour elsewhere was possibly worse but you make no comment there.
Can you debate without being patronising?
Sunbeam, I receive fairly regular comments from certain posters who generally agree with you, but not from those who don't, complaining that you get a rough ride on here,
My own thoughts are if you give it then be prepared to take it. Over the last few days, you called a poster an arsehole, one a smart arse, and now because someone doesn't share your opinion, they clearly don't understand the subject, which is insulting.
Firstly, I would ask those who say you are ganged up on, to be a bit more balanced before making the accusations. Secondly, if you see a post which makes you annoyed either leave it, or think about your answer before posting a put down or insult.
Seems so, but as in other cases where women have been involved in aiding and abetting abuse of children, I can never get my head around how any woman can do that, they really must have addled brains.
Re: Savile/Yewtree/Others (Part 2)
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2024 2:48 pm
by The Tick
birdie wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2024 2:45 pm
The date of 1690 obviously refers to the link on the BBC news page, feck all to do with offences in the 17th century.
