Page 1 of 3

ChatGPT

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:55 pm
by antdad
I've just got it to write a best man's speech and the results are well, rather artificial.

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:06 pm
by The Ghost of Alex Higgins
It provides 96% of the posts on talkFORUM, including this one

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:11 am
by beingsoblase
antdad wrote: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:55 pm I've just got it to write a best man's speech and the results are well, rather artificial.
Something like that should come from the heart surely?
My wedding speech went through about 6 drafts, as some things I thought were comedy genius just weren't after a read through later on.

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:27 am
by antdad
If it came from the heart they'd be a stoney silence, not exactly keen on the bride to be. :lol:

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2023 11:07 am
by VeritasVincit
antdad wrote: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:55 pm I've just got it to write a best man's speech and the results are well, rather artificial.
Have you used:
"The bride has only been unfaithful twice."
"Once with an old schoolfriend. And once with the localrugby team"

I'll get my coat.

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2023 11:43 am
by The Ghost of Alex Higgins
Done it twice. Cleared the floor. Repercussions still ongoing.

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2023 4:24 pm
by Sid Pervcat
Done it once, was shit.Never again.

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2023 6:48 am
by beingsoblase
"I'm afraid I can't do that, dave"

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2023 7:21 am
by antdad
Actually the ChatGPT results are usable, need a bit of refinement and personalisation but useable.

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:11 pm
by black_guardian
Sack of shite. Tried asking it to guess the scorers in a cup final from 1991 and it spewed out a player who never made the match day squad!!!

When I corrected it, it got into all apologetic mode and saying how it was AI and limited etc. Overrated.

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:22 pm
by subsub
antdad wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 7:21 am Actually the ChatGPT results are usable, need a bit of refinement and personalisation but useable.
Yep. It will only get better. I heard that it's currently at the level of a graduate, but within a year or so will have the education equivalent to a professor.
They'll monetise it before too long, no doubt.

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:22 pm
by Vespa
I've got an invite to the google version, been asking it dumb questions.

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:24 pm
by Vespa
subsub wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:22 pm
antdad wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 7:21 am Actually the ChatGPT results are usable, need a bit of refinement and personalisation but useable.
Yep. It will only get better. I heard that it's currently at the level of a graduate, but within a year or so will have the education equivalent to a professor.
They'll monetise it before too long, no doubt.
It's already doing the equivalent of rudimentary primary research in chemistry using quantum calculations to model material interactions.

Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2023 9:06 am
by lambrini
"The Godfather of AI" Geoffrey Hinton has resigned from Google to warn the world about the dangers of artificial intelligence. Hinton, poached by Google in the 2010s, spent his entire career searching for the technological brain formula, and only now regrets his actions after the sudden rise in artificial intelligence systems. Sorry, but what did he expect? Have today's scientists learned nothing from Oppenheimer and co? Play with uranium and you get Frankenstein's monster. Why couldn't they foresee the same outcome with deep tech?


Re: ChatGPT

Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2023 9:19 am
by The Ghost of Alex Higgins
"It is with deep regret..."