Page 73 of 74
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2024 5:11 pm
by Vespa
Keep defending him, it's an odd hill to die on..
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pm
by subsub
shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:20 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 5:43 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 4:52 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 4:36 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:41 am
He made a women's life miserable because the BBC sacked him, he gets what he deserves.
Nope. Wasn’t found guilty of that. Jeremy Whine an elitist got upset. That’s all.
He stalked four people, two of them have protection orders against him. It's interesting how many people defend stalkers - each to their own
I guess.
Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?
Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.
Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.
and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.
His sentencing notes are here -
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
You are getting into trolling territory here......
No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.
Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 6:24 am
by Vespa
subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:20 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 5:43 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 4:52 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 4:36 pm
Nope. Wasn’t found guilty of that. Jeremy Whine an elitist got upset. That’s all.
He stalked four people, two of them have protection orders against him. It's interesting how many people defend stalkers - each to their own
I guess.
Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?
Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.
Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.
and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.
His sentencing notes are here -
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
You are getting into trolling territory here......
No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.
Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
I'm sure if Alex repeated his behaviour towards anyone's mother on here and she said she was calling the police, posters on here would tell her they are only hurty words.
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 8:17 am
by PG30
The thing is saying hurty words against people I don’t know has no effect on my own life.
Where as when he makes these simplistic, populist, xenophobic, racist little YouTube videos. I tend to agree with these points and they feeds my hatred to people different to me.
So the first one has no impact on my life where as the other one warms my heart.
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 am
by shivah
subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:20 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 5:43 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 4:52 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 4:36 pm
Nope. Wasn’t found guilty of that. Jeremy Whine an elitist got upset. That’s all.
He stalked four people, two of them have protection orders against him. It's interesting how many people defend stalkers - each to their own
I guess.
Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?
Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.
Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.
and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.
His sentencing notes are here -
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
You are getting into trolling territory here......
No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.
Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 am
by subsub
shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 am
subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:20 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 5:43 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 4:52 pm
He stalked four people, two of them have protection orders against him. It's interesting how many people defend stalkers - each to their own
I guess.
Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?
Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.
Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.
and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.
His sentencing notes are here -
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
You are getting into trolling territory here......
No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.
Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.
Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 4:00 pm
by Vespa
subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 am
shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 am
subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:20 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 5:43 pm
Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?
Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.
Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.
and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.
His sentencing notes are here -
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
You are getting into trolling territory here......
No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.
Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.
Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
Defending a convicted stalker is an odd hill to die on.
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:41 pm
by shivah
subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 am
shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 am
subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:20 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 5:43 pm
Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?
Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.
Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.
and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.
His sentencing notes are here -
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
You are getting into trolling territory here......
No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.
Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.
Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
You are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:52 pm
by subsub
shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:41 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 am
shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 am
subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:20 pm
Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.
and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.
His sentencing notes are here -
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
You are getting into trolling territory here......
No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.
Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.
Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
You are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.
Of course they're different; I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed otherwise.
But you keep on using the term "hurty words" in an apparent attempt to belittle his crimes. That's your choice, but I don't think many rational people would agree with you.
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:18 am
by Vespa
subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:52 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:41 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 am
shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 am
subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pm
and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.
His sentencing notes are here -
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
You are getting into trolling territory here......
No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.
Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.
Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
You are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.
Of course they're different; I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed otherwise.
But you keep on using the term "hurty words" in an apparent attempt to belittle his crimes. That's your choice, but I don't think many rational people would agree with you.
Publishing pictures of his wife and kids is hardy hurty anything. He hounded these poor people, I hope YouTube demonistise his videos.
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Thu May 02, 2024 2:46 pm
by shivah
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:18 am
subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:52 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:41 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 am
shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 am
subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pm
You are getting into trolling territory here......
No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.
Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.
Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
You are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.
Of course they're different; I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed otherwise.
But you keep on using the term "hurty words" in an apparent attempt to belittle his crimes. That's your choice, but I don't think many rational people would agree with you.
Publishing pictures of his wife and kids is hardy hurty anything. He hounded these poor people, I hope YouTube demonistise his videos.
Jeremy Whine is a "poor person". Someone himself who constantly trolls car drivers.
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Thu May 02, 2024 3:51 pm
by Vespa
shivah wrote: ↑Thu May 02, 2024 2:46 pm
Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:18 am
subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:52 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:41 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 am
shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 am
subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pm
subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pm
shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pm
You are getting into trolling territory here......
No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.
Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.
Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
You are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.
Of course they're different; I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed otherwise.
But you keep on using the term "hurty words" in an apparent attempt to belittle his crimes. That's your choice, but I don't think many rational people would agree with you.
Publishing pictures of his wife and kids is hardy hurty anything. He hounded these poor people, I hope YouTube demonistise his videos.
Jeremy Whine is a "poor person". Someone himself who constantly trolls car drivers.
Keep defending a stalker.
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 12:23 am
by Vespa
Sivah's favourite stalker has agreed to pay a police detective damages for libel
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-n ... 943197.amp
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 12:49 am
by subsub
Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 9:26 pm
by theleader82
He was represented by the black belt barrister. Another popular youtuber
