Page 7 of 15

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:32 pm
by lasharoo
PG30 wrote:Wouldn't mind Nigel taking the stage next year. Would be interesting to see what kind of reaction he gets

Seeing as Glastonbury these days is chock full of city bankers and the corporate crowd you would think it would be his natural audience, but as soon as they all set foot in their £2000-for-the-weekend yurts and teepees and don their Louis Vuitton wellies they all suddenly morph into Jezza Corbyn fans.........we live in strange times.

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:39 pm
by theleader82
The jacksons are very good on BBC 4 , even without michaels

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:58 pm
by kevin04
Grohl is a brilliant front man, and the Foos are not to shabby either.

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:25 pm
by subsub
PG30 wrote:
subsub wrote:The Foo Fighters are just so average - how do they get to headline Glasto?

Dave Grohl seems a right laugh, but you still need some tunes. They're just a generic rock band; could be absolutely anyone. Don't get it at all.



I'm a pretentious twat when it comes to music. But I think there's a place for a generic rock band, and the foos are the best at it.

I am a bit biased though due to being a massive nirvana fan at school

Nirvana were phenomenal, but to me that just highlights how mediocre the FFs are. I get all the frontman stuff, but they just don't have the tunes.

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:36 pm
by deisegirl
yeah even if I don't care for a band I can still recognise when they have a good selection of tunes but for such a big band they don't have many "anthems"

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:42 pm
by PG30
Haha

3 more hours

Crowd has a sense of humour

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:42 pm
by kevin04
Grohl is a dude, and a great frontman.

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:43 pm
by Jonathan
theleader82 wrote:The jacksons are very good on BBC 4 , even without michaels


Yeah, a few dodgy notes here and there but decent enough

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:47 pm
by deisegirl
Just looking at Jezza Christ. :shock:

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:02 am
by kevin04
They don't have anthems/choons?

Just listen to Everlong!

Brilliant.

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:05 am
by PG30
That was so much fun

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:06 am
by kevin04
Outstanding stuff.

Grohl is such a brilliant, engaging front man and the Foos are great, stadium rock.

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:09 am
by PG30
kevin04 wrote:Outstanding stuff.

Grohl is such a brilliant, engaging front man and the Foos are great, stadium rock.


Brilliant

And I Fucking hate stadium rock

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:22 am
by EddieCheddar
deisegirl wrote:yeah even if I don't care for a band I can still recognise when they have a good selection of tunes but for such a big band they don't have many "anthems"



Depends on your definition of 'anthemic'. I'd define the following FF tunes as anthems. But that's me and my taste ;)

I'll stick around
Everlong
Best of you
My hero
Walk
I should've known
The Pretender

Re: Glastonbury

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:48 am
by Petingo
What happened to The National?

They weren't on the recording I taped.