Page 11 of 16

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 1:30 pm
by Holden Mcgroyne
Terrible weather forecast tomorrow for Lancy v Essex.

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:05 am
by Holden Mcgroyne
Lucky if they'll get any play today :(

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:11 pm
by Holden Mcgroyne
Spend all July and August playing in pyjamas and you get this.

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 4:13 pm
by subsub
Holden Mcgroyne wrote:Spend all July and August playing in pyjamas and you get this.

Doesn't the Championship continue til virtually October?
Seems crazy scheduling in four county games in September...

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 4:17 pm
by Lou Grant
September generally has pretty good weather - certainly preferable to the middle of winter which is when the season inevitably starts. Also during the T20 season the weather was pretty ropey this year. There's no dry seasons and monsoon in the UK, so it's pretty much pot luck with the weather.

As the only unbeaten team and with 3 more wins than their nearest rivals, Essex will be worthy champions regardless of what the weather does in the next 3 weeks.

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 5:09 pm
by subsub
Lou Grant wrote:As the only unbeaten team and with 3 more wins than their nearest rivals, Essex will be worthy champions regardless of what the weather does in the next 3 weeks.

:smt023

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 3:48 pm
by Lou Grant
Lancashire 115-6. Pitch doesn't sound too bad. Lancashire need a few more Hameed's, players that don't sell their wicket cheaply.

Weather likely to be the winner, but already extended our lead in the table by a couple of extra points. :)

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 3:50 pm
by subsub
Lou Grant wrote:Lancashire 115-6. Pitch doesn't sound too bad. Lancashire need a few more Hameed's, players that don't sell their wicket cheaply.

Weather likely to be the winner, but already extended our lead in the table by a couple of extra points. :)

:D

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 5:54 pm
by JW90
Lou Grant wrote:Lancashire 115-6. Pitch doesn't sound too bad. Lancashire need a few more Hameed's, players that don't sell their wicket cheaply.

Weather likely to be the winner, but already extended our lead in the table by a couple of extra points. :)


Hope Essex win the title, we need more non-International counties winning these trophies. Will Cook and Westley be back after the Test this week?

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 6:04 pm
by Lou Grant
Think the next round of games starts the day after the test ends - sure they will want to play, but it's whether the England management will allow them.

Although Essex have exceeded my expectations by continuing to thrive without those two players who dominated from the batting point of view in the first half of the season.

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 6:45 pm
by Holden Mcgroyne
222/8, could be a decent score if conditions stay the same. Hamid 85 not out in nearly 5 and a half hours, the full Geoffrey. Might just have got him on the plane to Australia.

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 10:09 am
by Holden Mcgroyne
Pissing down in Manchester, game will be a draw, congratulations Essex

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 8:36 pm
by Salem
Excellent result for Worcestershire today at previously unbeaten Notts in Division 2 .

Top performance once again from Daryl Mitchell , scoring his sixth century of the season . Having lost the captaincy from last year , he's reacted in the best way possible .

Hopefully promotion beckons :partyman:

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 11:14 pm
by Lou Grant
Should've played more for England, imho. Deserves his own moment in the sun, even on Anderson's big day.

Re: County cricket season 2017

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 3:51 pm
by Zambo
The Bears lost 7 of the 8 wickets taken by LBWs.

I smell a conspiracy.