Jonathan wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:21 pm
... I’m not keen on this trial by media ...
Neither am I, but let's not forget that RB ruthlessly exploited "the media" to get rich and famous. And to fuck anyone he wanted.
He's even more famous now, but in a different way, and the nutcase conspiracy theories now involve RB being a weirdo predator. He's probably not keen on Youtube videos about that
"You don't have a world-view by just saying you hate Trump" - Norm Macdonald
"It seems as if every time I turn the station on at the moment this fucking mouth breather is polluting the airwaves with untrammeled bollocks." - MGA99
Jonathan wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:21 pm
Brand comes across to me as an odious sort of bloke, not someone I would wish to have a drink with etc. but I’m not keen on this trial by media and it raises a few questions why. Not sure it will help him get a fair trial either which could put that in jeopardy.
The media have absolutely fucked it as usual. Brand is gaining sympathy every day this goes on from some quarters, and at the same time from others, he's already been tried and found guilty.
Total farce.
When your heart is blue, there is nothing you can do. Keep Right On
paolo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:18 am
...they have been after him for a while now ...
Have they, though? This is the first story I've heard about RB in many a long year. Up until last week he was an irrelevance on the World Stage, if we're talking about his important views that will Break The Internet.
Some may say he still is. An irrelevance, I mean.
Fair play to the geezer, though. He uses The Media to talk about himself in a way that mocks the media for talking about him. It's a neat trick
"You don't have a world-view by just saying you hate Trump" - Norm Macdonald
"It seems as if every time I turn the station on at the moment this fucking mouth breather is polluting the airwaves with untrammeled bollocks." - MGA99
paolo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:18 am
whatever comes from the brand - outing
his voice will be silenced
charged or not, no msm will be obliged to have him on again
did he do it, did he not...seems like his behaviour was grim at best
if he did bad things....face twelve peers and take your medicine
maybe it's like mi6, mossad, epstein.....we'll keep this for a rainy day
the way he foisted truths on america recently made execs very uncomfortable as he presented their own facts back to them
he knew he would be targeted and that must be pressure, especially if you have previous, more so if it's bad
they have been after him for a while now, and you don't go against msm's controllers, big pharma, black rock, vanguard et al without consequences
and there aint many of us, public or private without skeletons....
How sadly predictable
That you would turn out for this arrogant buffoon.
By all means give him due process but FFS don't make him out to be a martyr.
He's had a good run selling drivel to the gullible.
If he hadn't someone else would have done.
paolo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:18 am
whatever comes from the brand - outing
his voice will be silenced
charged or not, no msm will be obliged to have him on again
did he do it, did he not...seems like his behaviour was grim at best
if he did bad things....face twelve peers and take your medicine
maybe it's like mi6, mossad, epstein.....we'll keep this for a rainy day
the way he foisted truths on america recently made execs very uncomfortable as he presented their own facts back to them
he knew he would be targeted and that must be pressure, especially if you have previous, more so if it's bad
they have been after him for a while now, and you don't go against msm's controllers, big pharma, black rock, vanguard et al without consequences
and there aint many of us, public or private without skeletons....
How sadly predictable
That you would turn out for this arrogant buffoon.
By all means give him due process but FFS don't make him out to be a martyr.
He's had a good run selling drivel to the gullible.
If he hadn't someone else would have done.
It reminds me how they went after Alex belfield for exposing the bbc
paolo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:18 am
whatever comes from the brand - outing
his voice will be silenced
charged or not, no msm will be obliged to have him on again
did he do it, did he not...seems like his behaviour was grim at best
if he did bad things....face twelve peers and take your medicine
maybe it's like mi6, mossad, epstein.....we'll keep this for a rainy day
the way he foisted truths on america recently made execs very uncomfortable as he presented their own facts back to them
he knew he would be targeted and that must be pressure, especially if you have previous, more so if it's bad
they have been after him for a while now, and you don't go against msm's controllers, big pharma, black rock, vanguard et al without consequences
and there aint many of us, public or private without skeletons....
How sadly predictable
That you would turn out for this arrogant buffoon.
By all means give him due process but FFS don't make him out to be a martyr.
He's had a good run selling drivel to the gullible.
If he hadn't someone else would have done.
It reminds me how they went after Alex belfield for exposing the bbc
Who's "they"?
He's a serial stalker who was rightly convicted for his crimes.