subsub wrote:... but if the end result is a shitload more money raised, is that a bad thing?
It is if the money is going to a corrupt dictatorship.
It is if the money is raised is being spent poorly, ie: dropping bags of grain to people starving when what is actually required is the installation of basic farming infrastructure and a long term programme of skills education.
It is if you want to infantalize a group of people. Throwing money at the poor and needy ultimately humiliates them and compounds their sense of hopelessness and propagates a self-fullfilling prophesy of poverty.
It is if the person giving the money is totally ignorant of where the money is actually going and only doing so of a personal sense of wellbeing. The person donating is then less likely to donate money to local causes; they think "ok, I've done my bit because I've donated 50quid to Comic Relief". I just don't think the ends justifies the means.
It is if you want to continue the worrying trend of 'poverty porn' that seems to be pervading sections of the media.
It is if you want to the peddle the myth that money solves all problems, when in fact, it is actually time and human contact most people want.
It is if you wish to funnel money into huge global charities that eat up vast sums of money though excessive and poorly organised administion.
I mean ... I could go on this rant for weeks.
“Ordinary men hate solitude. But the Master makes use of it, embracing his aloneness, realizing he is one with the whole universe.” ~ Lao Tzu.
"The world needs bad men. We keep the other bad men from the door". ~ RC, True Detective.