Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2024 5:11 pm
Keep defending him, it's an odd hill to die on..
Now officially more entertaining than Talksport.
https://www.talkforum.co.uk/
But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pmNope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pmNo, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pmYou are getting into trolling territory here......Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pmHis sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdfshivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pmand as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:20 pmYour defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 5:43 pmWas he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?
Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
I'm sure if Alex repeated his behaviour towards anyone's mother on here and she said she was calling the police, posters on here would tell her they are only hurty words.subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pmBut your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pmNope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pmNo, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pmYou are getting into trolling territory here......Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pmHis sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdfshivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pmand as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:20 pmYour defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 5:43 pmWas he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?
Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pmBut your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pmNope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pmNo, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pmYou are getting into trolling territory here......Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pmHis sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdfshivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pmand as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:20 pmYour defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 5:43 pmWas he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?
Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 amThere is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pmBut your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pmNope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pmNo, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pmYou are getting into trolling territory here......Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pmHis sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdfshivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:36 pmand as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:20 pmYour defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
Defending a convicted stalker is an odd hill to die on.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 amYes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 amThere is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pmBut your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pmNope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pmNo, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pmYou are getting into trolling territory here......Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pmHis sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
You are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 amYes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 amThere is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pmBut your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pmNope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pmNo, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pmYou are getting into trolling territory here......Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pmHis sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
Of course they're different; I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed otherwise.shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:41 pmYou are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 amYes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 amThere is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pmBut your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pmNope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pmNo, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pmYou are getting into trolling territory here......Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pmHis sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
Publishing pictures of his wife and kids is hardy hurty anything. He hounded these poor people, I hope YouTube demonistise his videos.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:52 pmOf course they're different; I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed otherwise.shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:41 pmYou are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 amYes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 amThere is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pmBut your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pmNope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pmNo, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pmYou are getting into trolling territory here......Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pmHis sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
But you keep on using the term "hurty words" in an apparent attempt to belittle his crimes. That's your choice, but I don't think many rational people would agree with you.
Jeremy Whine is a "poor person". Someone himself who constantly trolls car drivers.Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:18 amPublishing pictures of his wife and kids is hardy hurty anything. He hounded these poor people, I hope YouTube demonistise his videos.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:52 pmOf course they're different; I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed otherwise.shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:41 pmYou are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 amYes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 amThere is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pmBut your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.shivah wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:28 pmNope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.subsub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:58 pmNo, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:20 pmYou are getting into trolling territory here......Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:44 pm
His sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf
This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.
What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
But you keep on using the term "hurty words" in an apparent attempt to belittle his crimes. That's your choice, but I don't think many rational people would agree with you.
Keep defending a stalker.shivah wrote: ↑Thu May 02, 2024 2:46 pmJeremy Whine is a "poor person". Someone himself who constantly trolls car drivers.Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:18 amPublishing pictures of his wife and kids is hardy hurty anything. He hounded these poor people, I hope YouTube demonistise his videos.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:52 pmOf course they're different; I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed otherwise.shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:41 pmYou are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:33 amYes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.shivah wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 11:05 amThere is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.subsub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:39 pmBut your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.
But you keep on using the term "hurty words" in an apparent attempt to belittle his crimes. That's your choice, but I don't think many rational people would agree with you.
Vespa wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2024 12:23 am Sivah's favourite stalker has agreed to pay a police detective damages for libel https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-n ... 943197.amp