Re: Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 2:53 pm
…for a very long time
Now officially more entertaining than Talksport.
https://www.talkforum.co.uk/
…for a very long time
The argument is he's a political prisoner. He upset Whine who can't cope with any criticism and is part of the wider "elite" of the media. Belfield was also very naive - probably stupid - by not moving on to other targets and keeping a select few going.subsub wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 6:33 pmThank you for sharing, Lead-o.
Hopkins is utterly unhinged.
Twice she said that Belfield was jailed "for making a few videos online".
No, he was jailed because he's a serial stalker.
She also said that he should be released early because he has elderly parents
Perhaps he should have thought about that before doing what he did. Personally, I'd make his sentence much longer.
Classic whataboutery.
Can you name a rapist he has served longer than?
Nail on the headZambo wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:45 pm @ subsub.
No whataboutery, unless you are saying guidelines shouldn't be questioned. If not why not, as some clearly do not bring justice for the victims of crime.
I think it's fair to use examples, where some criminals get tougher or more lenient sentences than others, and justice has not been seen to have been done.
Personally, I'm happy with a tough sentence for stalkers, but very unhappy with some of the joke sentences for serious crimes.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/17327 ... vors-TrustVespa wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:40 pmCan you name a rapist he has served longer than?
then the guidelines are stupid. He's been hit by a double whammy of both a criminal conviction and being hit in the civil courts for claims. The irony? This will force him to come out and do the same again as he made money from it first time round. Different targets yep.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:11 pmClassic whataboutery.
His sentencing was in line with the guidelines. The sentences for other crimes and offences are nothing to do with it.
Two years for rape ... amazingshivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:23 amhttps://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/17327 ... vors-TrustVespa wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:40 pmCan you name a rapist he has served longer than?
He made a women's life miserable because the BBC sacked him, he gets what he deserves.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:25 amthen the guidelines are stupid. He's been hit by a double whammy of both a criminal conviction and being hit in the civil courts for claims. The irony? This will force him to come out and do the same again as he made money from it first time round. Different targets yep.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:11 pmClassic whataboutery.
His sentencing was in line with the guidelines. The sentences for other crimes and offences are nothing to do with it.
And the fact that he still is in a cat C when he's about as tough as George from Rainbow is fucking disgusting and heaps on to the point - he's there for political reasons not for justice.
He was found not guilty of stalking the 4 women from the bbcVespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:41 amHe made a women's life miserable because the BBC sacked him, he gets what he deserves.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:25 amthen the guidelines are stupid. He's been hit by a double whammy of both a criminal conviction and being hit in the civil courts for claims. The irony? This will force him to come out and do the same again as he made money from it first time round. Different targets yep.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:11 pmClassic whataboutery.
His sentencing was in line with the guidelines. The sentences for other crimes and offences are nothing to do with it.
And the fact that he still is in a cat C when he's about as tough as George from Rainbow is fucking disgusting and heaps on to the point - he's there for political reasons not for justice.
He started stalking after he got the sack. He's a creep weird people support.theleader82 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 3:21 pmHe was found not guilty of stalking the 4 women from the bbcVespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:41 amHe made a women's life miserable because the BBC sacked him, he gets what he deserves.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:25 amthen the guidelines are stupid. He's been hit by a double whammy of both a criminal conviction and being hit in the civil courts for claims. The irony? This will force him to come out and do the same again as he made money from it first time round. Different targets yep.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:11 pmClassic whataboutery.
His sentencing was in line with the guidelines. The sentences for other crimes and offences are nothing to do with it.
And the fact that he still is in a cat C when he's about as tough as George from Rainbow is fucking disgusting and heaps on to the point - he's there for political reasons not for justice.
Nope. Wasn’t found guilty of that. Jeremy Whine an elitist got upset. That’s all.Vespa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:41 amHe made a women's life miserable because the BBC sacked him, he gets what he deserves.shivah wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:25 amthen the guidelines are stupid. He's been hit by a double whammy of both a criminal conviction and being hit in the civil courts for claims. The irony? This will force him to come out and do the same again as he made money from it first time round. Different targets yep.subsub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:11 pmClassic whataboutery.
His sentencing was in line with the guidelines. The sentences for other crimes and offences are nothing to do with it.
And the fact that he still is in a cat C when he's about as tough as George from Rainbow is fucking disgusting and heaps on to the point - he's there for political reasons not for justice.