Page 4 of 5
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 3:30 pm
by The Ghost of Alex Higgins
How many bailiwick bros still got t'acorn hoody?
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 4:52 pm
by lambrini
Angels and Airwaves
Noooo
@Sadact7
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 7:54 pm
by henrycrs
Cock (have one or ever had one) = man
No cock = woman
Puberty blocking shit is as bad as child abuse.
Leave the kids alone.
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 8:06 pm
by chelseachelsea
henrycrs wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 7:54 pm
Cock (have one or ever had one) = man
No cock = woman
Puberty blocking shit is as bad as child abuse.
Leave the kids alone.
+1
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 8:31 pm
by lambrini
henrycrs wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 7:54 pm
Cock (have one or ever had one) = man
No cock = woman
Puberty blocking shit is as bad as child abuse.
Leave the kids alone.
Exactly.
I truly feel sorry for kids these days.
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 9:19 pm
by Sunbeam Alpine
I don't think you ( or I) have the faintest idea of how these things are done.
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 9:27 pm
by Vespa
Sunbeam Alpine wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 9:19 pm
I don't think you ( or I) have the faintest idea of how these things are done.
I think most people would agree changing the physiological structure of a child is wrong.
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2024 4:29 am
by antdad
lambrini wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 1:48 pm
But, I digress... My point is,
children (U18 in the UK) should never undergo surgical alterations, nor should they be hastily diagnosed as 'trans' without careful consideration of the circumstances I outlined above.
The don't and never have in the UK and when they have gone on to surgeries it's still as it should be incredibly rare.
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2024 8:54 am
by lambrini
Sunbeam Alpine wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2024 9:19 pm
I don't think you ( or I) have the faintest idea of how these things are done.
All due respect, but you are beyond mad, Hillman.
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:33 am
by Sunbeam Alpine
You would know..
Your opinion is always right...anyone else is ideologically-driven ( or Mad). It doesn't occur to you that some of the negative views expressed here might also be ideological, does it?
Recently you told us that one of the ( apparently , for you) wrong things about nationalisation is the emergence of unions ( which , of course, must always be BAD).
Funny thing is that most train companies have had stoppages in the last week. THEY ARE UNIONISED.
The massively better European transport systems are largely nationalised, and universally unionised. And yet....
So are most of the German businesses that beat the pants off their UK competitors. Something to do with German managers being grown-up , seeing the benefit of unions, and NOT IDEOLOGICALLY DRIVEN.
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:46 am
by The Tick
Ultimately this is a case of physically altering a child through use of hormones, which can have harmful medical consequences.
A child isn't of sound enough mind to make such decisions regarding their physical health.
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2024 12:13 pm
by Sid Pervcat
Sunbeam Alpine wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:33 am
You would know..
Your opinion is always right...anyone else is ideologically-driven ( or Mad). It doesn't occur to you that some of the negative views expressed here might also be ideological, does it?
Recently you told us that one of the ( apparently , for you) wrong things about nationalisation is the emergence of unions ( which , of course, must always be BAD).
Funny thing is that most train companies have had stoppages in the last week. THEY ARE UNIONISED.
The massively better European transport systems are largely nationalised, and universally unionised. And yet....
So are most of the German businesses that beat the pants off their UK competitors. Something to do with German managers being grown-up , seeing the benefit of unions, and NOT IDEOLOGICALLY DRIVEN.
Not quite sure what this has to do with Puberty Blockers, but err.....yeah, whatevs
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2024 12:29 pm
by antdad
Cass actually said this morning on R4 (8.33am) the use of hormones was safe when used to treat other conditions like precocious puberty but the results were lesser known for the treatment for gender dysphoria so they will go back to using a research based protocol.
A child was and will never have made the decision to undergo treatment unilaterly, that's a fundamental misunderstanding of the process. For some the medical pathway will be the correct one no matter what the objection, transphobic or otherwise.
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2024 12:41 pm
by Sunbeam Alpine
Agreed
Re: Puberty blockers banned
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 8:13 am
by lambrini
The Tick wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:46 am
Ultimately this is a case of physically altering a child through use of hormones, which can have harmful medical consequences.
A child isn't of sound enough mind to make such decisions regarding their physical health.
+1
@Sadact7