Re: What’s going on with the Royals these days?
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:42 pm
I will say that I dislike Meghan Markle almost as much as I hate Mrs Parker-Bowles.
Now officially more entertaining than Talksport.
https://www.talkforum.co.uk/
All I will say is (responding to yet another one of your goads), is that I dislike Meghan for the same reason I dislike Lewis Hamilton. Can you work it out?subsub wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:34 pmNot bothered why, just noticed two little non-sequitur digs aimed at Meghan when everyone else was discussing the non-story of a badly Photoshopped pic. But carry on trying to stir the pot and derail the thread if you wish. Zambo will doubtless be along any minute to inform me what I was "clearly" trying to doSalem wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 5:19 pmI think we all know why , eh Subs ?subsub wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:01 pmNot a fan of Meghan, then?birdie wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 3:49 pm Of course Meghan would never make such a mistake, she wouldn't be submitting an amateur photo in the first place, nothing but the best professional photographer who can tweak without it being obvious.
Still, something else for the gruesome twosome to slag the family off for.
Right on cue...Zambo wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:44 pmAll I will say is (responding to yet another one of your goads), is that I dislike Meghan for the same reason I dislike Lewis Hamilton. Can you work it out?subsub wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:34 pmNot bothered why, just noticed two little non-sequitur digs aimed at Meghan when everyone else was discussing the non-story of a badly Photoshopped pic. But carry on trying to stir the pot and derail the thread if you wish. Zambo will doubtless be along any minute to inform me what I was "clearly" trying to doSalem wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 5:19 pmI think we all know why , eh Subs ?subsub wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:01 pmNot a fan of Meghan, then?birdie wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 3:49 pm Of course Meghan would never make such a mistake, she wouldn't be submitting an amateur photo in the first place, nothing but the best professional photographer who can tweak without it being obvious.
Still, something else for the gruesome twosome to slag the family off for.
There is no need to cover anything else. Everyone knows by now that most of your posts contain snidey little digs and loaded/trolling questions, and this was no exception. The question you asked Birdie was totally unnecessary, because you already knew the answer, didn't you.
Only me and Salem this time, but thankfully more posters have now got you sussed. In this instance, you received the response which your post was designed to get, so chalk another one up.subsub wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 7:25 pmRight on cue...Zambo wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:44 pmAll I will say is (responding to yet another one of your goads), is that I dislike Meghan for the same reason I dislike Lewis Hamilton. Can you work it out?subsub wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:34 pmNot bothered why, just noticed two little non-sequitur digs aimed at Meghan when everyone else was discussing the non-story of a badly Photoshopped pic. But carry on trying to stir the pot and derail the thread if you wish. Zambo will doubtless be along any minute to inform me what I was "clearly" trying to doSalem wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 5:19 pmI think we all know why , eh Subs ?subsub wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:01 pmNot a fan of Meghan, then?birdie wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 3:49 pm Of course Meghan would never make such a mistake, she wouldn't be submitting an amateur photo in the first place, nothing but the best professional photographer who can tweak without it being obvious.
Still, something else for the gruesome twosome to slag the family off for.
There is no need to cover anything else. Everyone knows by now that most of your posts contain snidey little digs and loaded/trolling questions, and this was no exception. The question you asked Birdie was totally unnecessary, because you already knew the answer, didn't you.
It wasn't a loaded question at all, but you and Salem just can't help yourselves, can you?
Thank you.
I suggest you stay on topic and cut out the personal attacks.Zambo wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 7:50 pmOnly me and Salem this time, but thankfully more posters have now got you sussed. In this instance, you received the response which your post was designed to get, so chalk another one up.subsub wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 7:25 pmRight on cue...Zambo wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:44 pmAll I will say is (responding to yet another one of your goads), is that I dislike Meghan for the same reason I dislike Lewis Hamilton. Can you work it out?subsub wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:34 pmNot bothered why, just noticed two little non-sequitur digs aimed at Meghan when everyone else was discussing the non-story of a badly Photoshopped pic. But carry on trying to stir the pot and derail the thread if you wish. Zambo will doubtless be along any minute to inform me what I was "clearly" trying to doSalem wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 5:19 pmI think we all know why , eh Subs ?subsub wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:01 pmNot a fan of Meghan, then?birdie wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 3:49 pm Of course Meghan would never make such a mistake, she wouldn't be submitting an amateur photo in the first place, nothing but the best professional photographer who can tweak without it being obvious.
Still, something else for the gruesome twosome to slag the family off for.
There is no need to cover anything else. Everyone knows by now that most of your posts contain snidey little digs and loaded/trolling questions, and this was no exception. The question you asked Birdie was totally unnecessary, because you already knew the answer, didn't you.
It wasn't a loaded question at all, but you and Salem just can't help yourselves, can you?
Did the rumour go on to say what actually happened? Where did the rumour originate?
Of course there are.
Got scooped out is the rumour.
+1